# Palestinian Embassy challenges ‘liberation’ of Haifa narrative

2026-09-23T05:02:46+00:00 | World & Diplomacy | Indian Opinion Desk

Corroboration: 3 independent outlets

The Palestinian Embassy in India has formally questioned the description of the 1918 Battle of Haifa as a 'liberation', arguing that Indian soldiers fought under British command in an imperial campaign that resulted in the occupation of Palestine. The Embassy's five-page position paper says the battle should be understood within the context of British military occupation of Palestine, not as an act of Indian sovereign military action. The paper points out that India did not exist as a sovereign state in 1918, and that British military records use terms like 'capture', 'take' and 'conquer', not 'liberation'. It also cites India's 2014 publication 'Indian War Memorials Around the World', which does not describe the event as liberation. The Embassy further notes that Mahatma Gandhi opposed a Jewish state in Palestine, and that India voted against UN Resolution 181 in 1947 which proposed partition and allocated Haifa to the proposed Jewish state. The Hindu reports that the battle has been commemorated in India as a symbol of valour and as a diplomatic bridge to Israel, with memorials and annual ceremonies. The Palestinian Embassy, however, maintains that Haifa should be recognised as a Palestinian city at the time, and that the battle took place in the context of British military occupation of Palestine.

## Indian Opinion Analysis

The Hindu frames the battle as a site of layered remembrance balancing valour with moral ambiguity. The Palestinian Embassy and The Wire present a uniform critique: the battle was British imperial occupation, not liberation, and Indian soldiers lacked sovereign authority. The Hindu's framing highlights Indian agency within imperial constraints, the critical framings foreground colonial structure. The key factual disagreement is terminology, liberation versus occupation, with British war records supporting neither fully. The Embassy has laid down a formal position that contrasts sharply with diplomatic commemorations, making the historical framing of the battle a live political question for India's ties with both Israel and Palestine.

## Coverage

- thehindu.com (neutral report) <https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/haifa-a-century-old-battle-the-politics-of-memory/article71496489.ece>
  Presents multiple perspectives including Palestinian critique without endorsing any
- greaterkashmir.com (government critical) <https://www.greaterkashmir.com/world/palestine-embassy-questions-liberation-of-haifa-narrative-calls-for-historical-scrutiny-12566196>
  Foregrounds Palestinian opposition to official Indian commemorative narrative
- m.thewire.in (government critical) <https://m.thewire.in/article/world/rewriting-of-india-palestine-history-is-the-battle-of-haifa-an-act-of-liberation-or-occupation>
  Argues Israel has distorted history for political purposes

Tags: Battle of Haifa, India-Israel relations, Palestine Embassy
Canonical: https://indianopinion.org/palestine-embassy-questions-indian-haifa-liberation-narrative/
License: Summary and commentary (c) Indian Opinion, reusable with attribution. Facts belong to the linked sources.
Cite: https://indianopinion.org/palestine-embassy-questions-indian-haifa-liberation-narrative/#story-in-brief
