Panel Recommends Internal Quota: 6% for Dalit Left, 5% for Dalit Right

Quick Summary:

• The one-man commission led by H.N. Nagamohan Das has submitted its report on internal reservation for 101 Scheduled Castes in Karnataka.
• A separate group within the 17% reservation for SCs has been created, offering 1% to Adi karnataka (AK), Adi Dravida (AD), and Adi Andhra (AA).
• The Dalit left group (Madigas) is proposed to receive 6%,while the Dalit right group (Holeyas) gets 5%.
• Lambani, Korama, Koracha, and Bhovi communities are allocated 4%, with over 40 nomadic tribes classified as micro communities receiving a combined total of 1%.
• population size alongside social and educational backwardness was used to determine allocations.
• confusion persists due to continued use of colonial-era nomenclatures like AK,AD,and AA by several lakhs within SC groups.
• Micro communities are given higher weightage in public employment depiction under this proposal.
• Dalit left groups have strongly welcomed the report’s submission and demanded its swift implementation through legislative action. Protests starting August 11 have been announced until an order is issued.
• Some unhappy touchable SC groups and Dalit rights oppose aspects of the matrix allocation; they may seek review by a Cabinet subcommittee.

Indian Opinion Analysis:

The submission of H.N. Nagamohan Das’s report addresses longstanding debates over internal reservations among Scheduled Castes in Karnataka. By emphasizing population size paired with social disadvantage as criteria for allocation, this approach seeks balance amid ancient classification complexities like AK, AD, and AA nomenclature.

While celebrated by some groups such as the Dalit left advocating internal caste justice reforms for decades, dissatisfaction among touchable communities reflects challenges in evenly distributing benefits across diverse micro-groups.The opposition may lead to further deliberations at administrative levels before implementation proceeds.

Karnataka finds itself on a critical path toward possibly transformative changes that could impact representation equity within public services substantially if handled inclusively yet decisively.

Read more