– Sponsored by Qualcomm, raising questions of bias.
– Narrow geographical scope focusing on a carrier where Qualcomm modems traditionally perform better than Apple’s.
– Only tested speed metrics; stability, latency, or power utilization were not evaluated.
While this study suggests significant performance differences favoring Qualcomm over Apple’s C1 modem in specific scenarios, several factors warrant cautious interpretation of these results. The limited geographical scope (three locations in one NYC neighborhood), use of a single carrier (T-Mobile), and omission of device details reduce the reliability for broader conclusions about consumer experience across India or globally. Additionally, the sponsorship by Qualcomm introduces potential bias.
For India-a market progressively adopting new broadband technologies like SA 5G-studies like these may hold interest but should be weighed against truly autonomous assessments encompassing diverse environments and carriers typical to Indian geography. Apple’s focus on lower power utilization could remain pivotal for energy-conscious consumers here as they await future iterations capable of competing with top-tier offerings like Snapdragon modems.