– Poultry scientist Rocio Crespo called Kennedy’s idea “crazy,” citing high bird mortality (90-100% within days).- Genetic resistance is unlikely, as birds die too quickly for research or immunity progress.
– Farmers cull infected flocks under USDA guidance, financially compensated for losses; containment has been effective since the 1980s.
– The current strain introduces challenges by spreading year-round among wild birds and mammals.
– Scientists are researching vaccine improvements to reduce viral transmission while maintaining export viability.
Kennedy’s proposed strategy reveals a knowledge gap regarding avian influenza’s biology and its catastrophic economic risks. By suggesting mass exposure without culling infected birds, his plan contradicts established scientific understanding that containment prevents widespread devastation among flocks-a major source of food production globally.
India, as a significant consumer and producer of poultry products, should observe such developments carefully due to potential ripple effects on international trade standards or outbreaks affecting imports/export policies post-disease emergence in other markets.
The resilience demonstrated by existing biosecurity protocols highlights the importance of science-driven policymaking rather than speculation-based approaches that could amplify consequences while reducing economic security around essentials like affordable eggs or meat supplies worldwide. Should genetic research successfully make vaccinations more effective over time without trade limitations-as explored in current studies-it may serve as an adaptable model for India’s agriculture systems facing similar threats in the long-term future.