### Quick Summary
– Rishabh Pant showed visible frustration on Day 3 of teh Headingley Test when the on-field umpire, Chris Gaffaney, denied multiple requests by India too change the ball.
– After jasprit Bumrah’s initial appeal was turned down following a gauge check, Pant raised the issue again but was met with the same response. He reacted by flinging the ball backhandedly toward bowler Mohammed Siraj.
– The crowd at Headingley responded with jeers to Pant’s gesture, which might draw scrutiny from match officials for showing dissent.
– India captain Shubman gill and Bumrah also approached Gaffaney later about the ball condition. Former cricketer Ravi Shastri suggested that repeatedly approaching umpires could irritate them further.- At that time, England’s Harry Brook gained momentum in batting while countering India’s packed close-in field setup.
– Earlier in Day 3 action,Ollie Pope (106) fell to Prasidh Krishna soon after play resumed; it marked Krishna’s first wicket of this Test match.
– India had scored 471 in their first innings, propelled by centuries from Yashasvi Jaiswal, Shubman Gill, and Rishabh Pant. However, they lost seven wickets for just 41 runs after a strong start.

—
### Indian Opinion Analysis
Rishabh Pant’s outburst reflects frustrations common among competitive players facing critical moments where decisions don’t align with perceptions on-field. While it underscores his passion and desire for fair play conditions regarding a deteriorating ball potentially affecting performance outcomes or team’s strategy against oppositional batting-it raises questions about maintaining decorum under spotlight situations witnessed globally.
India losing wickets rapidly post dominant standout centuries reflects structural middle-lower order frailty dampening earlier commanding position deserving stronger finishing showcasing reliance concentrated pear top orders consistency meanwhile highlighting needed overall balance adaptability optimizing collective overall resilience performances .