Sambhaji Brigade Leader Pravin Gaikwad Allegedly Assaulted Over Remarks on Swami Samarth

Quick Summary

• Pravin Gaikwad, founding member of the Sambhaji Brigade, was attacked and ink was hurled on him by alleged Shivdharm Foundation activists in Akkalkot, Solapur district, on July 13, 2025.
• The incident occurred when Mr. Gaikwad visited Akkalkot to attend a felicitation ceremony organized by an educational institute and Sakal Maratha samaj.
• A viral video shows Mr. Gaikwad being manhandled, pulled out of his car, smeared with black oil-like ink, and having his car vandalized.
• Protesters objected to statements allegedly made by Mr. Gaikwad regarding Swami Samarth’s legacy and demanded renaming the Sambhaji Brigade as “Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Brigade.”
• Police booked Deepak Kate and six other alleged attackers under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) but released them after issuing notices.
• Mr. Gaikwad termed this attack as an attempt to suppress his “progressive thoughts” and linked it ideologically with earlier attacks on rationalist thinkers like Dr Dabholkar and Gauri Lankesh.
• politicians Amol Kolhe (NCP) condemned the violence as deplorable, while Jitendra Awhad voiced support for Mr. Gaikwad’s progressive ideology.
• The Sambhaji Brigade has previously been involved in ideological activism, including its controversial role in vandalizing a research institution over objections to a foreign scholar’s book about Shivaji Maharaj.

Indian Opinion Analysis

This incident highlights ongoing tensions between conflicting ideological groups in India concerning historical legacy and social reform narratives. The use of violence to suppress differing viewpoints-especially those deemed “progressive”-raises serious concerns about public discourse deteriorating into physical confrontations rather than intellectual debates.

The response from law enforcement-detaining suspects but releasing them on notices-also points towards emerging challenges in maintaining civil order while navigating sensitive ideological disputes tied deeply to regional identity politics.

Given India’s legal protections for free speech coupled with an expectation for responsible dissent under constitutional norms, such events emphasize the need for societal channels that can mediate these debates without escalating conflicts into violence. This case also reflects broader implications where regional ideologies intersect cultural sensitivities-a recurring theme requiring careful policy focus moving forward.

Read More