Sandeep Reddy Vanga Responds to Vikas Divyakirti’s Criticism of ‘Animal

Fast Summary

• Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s 2023 film “Animal,” starring Ranbir Kapoor, Anil Kapoor, Bobby Deol, Rashmika Mandanna, and Triptii Dimri, achieved commercial success but sparked controversy.
• The film faced criticism for allegedly glorifying toxic masculinity and regressive values.
• UPSC professor Vikas Divyakirti argued that the film sets society back by 10 years and prioritizes profit over social responsibility.
• On the Game Changers podcast, Sandeep Reddy Vanga defended his work against harsh reviews without directly naming critics. He emphasized filmmaking requires innate talent unlike cracking IAS exams which he said is possible through focused study over a few years.
• Vikas Divyakirti further suggested that creative mediums should aim at societal progress rather than just financial gain.

Read More: DNA India

Indian opinion Analysis

The clash between Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s defense of his filmmaking process and Vikas Divyakirti’s critique reflects ongoing debates about balancing artistic freedom with societal accountability.While “Animal” appears to have struck a chord commercially, concerns about its portrayal of toxic masculinity highlight larger discussions on cinema’s evolving role in shaping societal norms.

Sandeep’s argument comparing filmmaking to cracking IAS underscores differing perspectives on skillsets; however, it sidesteps deeper questions regarding responsibility in storytelling. Meanwhile, Divyakirti’s remarks question the ethics of profit-driven content creation at odds with progressive values in art. This exchange points to an essential dialog within India’s cultural sphere-how creativity can align with contemporary ethical standards without stifling artistic expression.