# SC refuses stay on meat ban near Somnath temple 2026-11-06T14:26:47+00:00 | Governance | Indian Opinion Desk Corroboration: 4 independent outlets The Supreme Court on Friday, 6 November 2026, declined to stay the Gujarat High Court’s interim order keeping a ban on non-vegetarian food and eggs within 500 metres of the Somnath temple in force. A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and PB Varale asked the High Court to decide the pending appeals preferably within two months, noting that a balanced approach was needed. The Gir Somnath District Magistrate issued the notification on 10 August under the Gujarat Police Act, 1951. A single judge struck it down on 30 October, but a division bench restored it the same day, citing the Deepavali festive season. Six restaurant operators challenged the restrictions. Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi argued the Act did not permit a permanent ban, while Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said eateries could serve non-vegetarian food outside the prohibited area. ## Indian Opinion Analysis All four outlets report the same core facts: the Supreme Court refused interim relief and gave the High Court two months to decide the appeals. Scroll.in frames the issue around personal dietary freedom, quoting the petitioners’ argument that 80% of Indians consume meat, while The Hans India leads with the court’s call for a ‘middle path’. News9live and Indian Express stay closer to wire-copy neutrality, listing the legal arguments without highlighting either side. The unanimous coverage reflects a court that is deferring the substantive question, leaving the High Court to balance religious sentiment, commercial rights and legal authority when it hears the matter on 25 November. The Hans India names all six petitioner eateries, other outlets name only Taj Restaurant. ## Coverage Coverage: 4 sources, 3 neutral, 1 sensationalist - news9live.com (neutral report) Straight factual account of proceedings - indianexpress.com (neutral report) Detailed legal timeline without advocacy - scroll.in (sensationalist) Leads with dietary freedom claim, drama-first phrasing - thehansindia.com (neutral report) Lists all petitioners and stretches covered This brief was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Update, 6 November 2026: this story now draws on 4 sources. Last updated 2026-11-06T14:51:22+00:00. Tags: Gujarat High Court, Gujarat Police Act, Somnath temple, Supreme Court Canonical: https://indianopinion.org/sc-refuses-stay-on-somnath-meat-ban-asks-hc-to-decide-in-two-months/ License: Summary and commentary (c) Indian Opinion, reusable with attribution. Facts belong to the linked sources. Cite: https://indianopinion.org/sc-refuses-stay-on-somnath-meat-ban-asks-hc-to-decide-in-two-months/#story-in-brief How this brief was made: an AI model read the reports linked above and wrote this summary and analysis, which were published automatically. Published briefs are sampled every hour by an automated quality check; the editor verifies its findings and approves corrections, and corrected briefs carry a dated correction line. Stance labels are editorial classifications of how each outlet framed this story, assigned by the same model, not ratings of the outlets. We do no original reporting. Methodology: https://indianopinion.org/ai-use-policy/