SC Rejects Plea Challenging Bihar PSC Chairperson Appointment

Rapid Summary

• Teh Supreme Court rejected a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the appointment of Parmar Ravi Manubhai as Chairperson of the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC).
• The court noted that an FIR filed against Parmar had already been closed.
• A judicial Bench led by justices P. S. Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar reprimanded the petitioner for filing a petition without proper factual basis, cautioning against “publicity-driven” PILs lacking substance.
• Initially,a fine of ₹10,000 was imposed on petitioner Brajesh Singh but was later waived following his apology.
• The PIL claimed Parmar lacked “impeccable character,” citing allegations of corruption and forgery lodged by bihar’s vigilance bureau-a charge reportedly dismissed by subsequent proceedings.

Indian Opinion Analysis
This ruling underscores the judiciary’s stance on maintaining diligence in submitting pils while promoting accountability in public-interest advocacy. By closing this matter, the Supreme Court demonstrates how procedural judgments regarding appointments must be based on factual scrutiny rather than speculation or unverified allegations-especially when constitutional posts are involved.

For India, this case reiterates two significant points: first, ensuring clarity in legal petitions to prevent misuse of judicial time; second, upholding fairness around appointments to critical roles while being mindful of resolved accusations or cleared charges through due process.

The court’s observations discourage frivolous petitions tied to personal motives or incomplete inquiries into candidates’ qualifications for public service posts-emphasizing fact-based portrayal as essential for safeguarding institutional integrity.

Read more