SC Ruling on Aadhaar Misrepresented, Opposition Spreading Misinformation: BJP

### Swift summary
– The Supreme Court clarified that Aadhaar cannot serve as address proof or basis for establishing citizenship during Bihar’s special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
– BJP accused opposition parties of spreading “false propaganda” by claiming that the court directed Aadhaar to be treated as proof of citizenship.
– BJP IT department head Amit Malviya emphasized that aadhaar’s purpose, under the Aadhaar Act, is limited to proving identity and residence-not citizenship.
– Section 16 of the Representation of People act disqualifies non-citizens from being included in electoral rolls; hence automatic voter enrollment via Aadhaar would violate laws.
– Malviya stated that 65 lakh names removed from Bihar’s voter list include fake, dead, Bangladeshi, and Rohingya entries. Only 84,305 objections (1.3%) have been filed against deletions-well under expected error margins.
– Supreme Court directed publication of deleted names to allow individuals an possibility to reapply.

[Read More](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sir-intact-sc-hasnt-allowed-aadhaar-to-be-used-for-enrolment-opposition-spreading-lies-bjp/articleshow/123489856.cms)

—

### Indian Opinion Analysis
The discussion around Aadhaar and its role in determining eligibility for voter registration highlights key legal safeguards on defining citizenship. The assertion by both Supreme Court and political functionaries emphasizes that identity documents like Aadhaar cannot legally replace more robust verifications required for inclusion in electoral rolls due to concerns over potential misuse and inaccuracies.The removal of 65 lakh entries raises meaningful implications regarding integrity in elections while addressing illegal or erroneous inclusions such as foreign nationals or duplicates. However, with only 1.3% objections filed post-deletion reporting-a figure claimed by BJP-it suggests low public contention despite opposition critique alleging disenfranchisement. Transparency measures suggested by courts appear essential here to ensure fairness while reinforcing public trust in governance processes.

By safeguarding voting rights through legal checks surrounding citizenship verification, India reiterates its commitment to fair democratic practices amidst evolving debates pertaining to document acceptability frameworks like those involving Aadhaar.