Supreme Court Seeks Response on Sakshi TV Channel Blocking

Quick Summary

• Justice P.S. Narasimha of the Supreme Court issued notices to the State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. State FiberNet Ltd. (APSFL), and 11 other respondents in a writ petition.
• The petition was filed by Indira Television Limited’s (Sakshi TV) whole-time Director B. Ramana Reddy regarding alleged disconnection of the channel by APSFL and major multi System Operators (MSOs) in Andhra Pradesh.
• The petitioner claimed the channel was disconnected after the 2024 general elections without prior notice or explanation, leading to a statewide blackout of Sakshi TV on distribution platforms.
• Counsel for Reddy argued that these actions violated constitutional Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 19(1)(g) and sought restoration of transmission as it existed on June 3, 2024.
• The court posted the matter for further hearing after three weeks.

Indian Opinion Analysis

This case brings attention to crucial constitutional principles concerning freedom of speech and fair business practices under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 19(1)(g).If proven true, allegations that coercive measures were used against msos to disconnect Sakshi TV raise concerns about potential misuse of state apparatus impacting media independence-a cornerstone in democratic governance.While the Supreme Court’s decision to issue notices is procedural at this stage, it signifies judicial scrutiny over claims that could have wider implications for balancing state powers with freedoms guaranteed under India’s Constitution. Ensuring transparency in such disputes will be essential for safeguarding media pluralism while addressing administrative irregularities.

Read More: Link