– Divorce granted to the husband under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
– Wife’s claim for permanent alimony (Rs 3 crore) and monthly maintenance (Rs 60,000) rejected.
– Husband awarded litigation costs (Rs 30,000).
– Husband directed to return gold ornaments belonging to his wife.!Representative Image
This legal case reflects the complexities often surrounding marital disputes in India. It underscores how modern investigative tools like RTI applications can play a critical role in uncovering hidden details within complex relationships. The verdict rejecting permanent alimony compensates for the documented evidence provided by the husband while addressing counterclaims by directing him to return gold ornaments.
The court’s ruling showcases India’s judicial system’s capacity to mediate intricate personal conflicts when presented wiht substantive proof from both sides. Though, this case also raises broader questions about trust erosion within marriages in modern urban settings and highlights challenges concerning legal protocols around bigamy accusations.
The critically important implication lies not only in protecting legal rights but also ensuring thorough resolution mechanisms consistent with existing laws under Hindu Marriage Act provisions-a reminder of evolving societal accountability standards amid marital complexities in urban India.