– Claims the Banakacherla project has not been approved by regulatory authorities like GRMB, CWC, or EAC.- argues that discussing an unapproved and illegal project undermines existing laws, tribunal judgments, and the credibility of central institutions.
– National recognition for Palamuru-Rangareddy and Dindi projects.
– Allocation of water resources for Pranahita (80 TMC) and Ichchampally (200 TMC floodwater utilization).
This meeting underscores lingering water disputes between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh post-bifurcation. While it presents an opportunity for cooperative resolution of shared river resource conflicts, differing priorities appear to persist strongly.
Telangana’s insistence on addressing pre-approved projects reflects its focus on resolving urgent developmental needs tied to equitable water-sharing arrangements. Conversely, its opposition to including a contentious topic like Banakacherla reveals concerns over adherence to legal frameworks governing such projects.
The central government’s role as a mediator could be pivotal here. balancing competing state interests while maintaining institutional credibility will be crucial in ensuring fair resolutions without setting undesirable precedents for interstate disputes over natural resources.