Top Officials Assigned to Investigate Allegations Against Suspended IAS N. Prasanth

### Speedy Summary
– The Kerala government has ordered a detailed inquiry into charges against suspended IAS officer N. Prasanth.
– A two-member panel of IAS officers will conduct the inquiry:
– Rajan N. Khobragade (Additional Chief Secretary, Health and Family welfare) serves as the Inquiring Authority.
– Tinku Biswal (principal Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management) acts as the Presenting Officer.
– Suspension orders for Mr. Prasanth were first issued on November 11, 2024; they have been extended as then.- Allegations against Mr. Prasanth include:
– Disappearance of files related to the Unnathi project during his tenure as CEO.
– Irregularities in his attendance records.
– The charges were outlined in Articles of Charges and Statement of Imputations served to him in December 2024.
– mr. Prasanth denies all allegations, with his explanations rejected by the government, necessitating further inquiry set to conclude within three months.
– Legal disputes followed; Mr. Prasanth served legal notices accusing key officials-including A. Jayathilak (then Additional Chief Secretary)-of fabricating documents and conspiring against him.### indian Opinion Analysis
The Kerala government’s decision to pursue an extended inquiry into allegations against N. Prasanth underscores its commitment to institutional accountability within administrative services but also highlights internal discord in governance structures. Allegations like file disappearances or attendance irregularities are serious given their implications for openness and efficiency.

Equally notable is Mr. Prasanth’s outright denial,accompanied by legal action towards supervisory officials-a rare move that reflects a potentially broader systemic challenge within state administration culture.

While a thorough investigation could establish facts decisively, prolonged suspension periods risk reputational damage for both individuals and institutions involved if not resolved expeditiously.Irrespective of outcome, this case serves as an important precedent regarding professional integrity among public servants under scrutiny.

*Read more:* Published July 24, 2025 at Source Link