Quick Summary
- CPI-M opposition announced a boycott of the remaining Budget session of the Tripura Assembly, alleging Speaker Biswa Bandhu Sen’s “partisan behavior.”
- The boycott follows rejection of a privilege motion by Leader of Opposition (LoP) Jitendra Chaudhury against Parliamentary Affairs Minister Ratan Lal Nath for alleged “racist” remarks targeted at Chaudhury,a senior tribal leader.
- Speaker denied the motion citing procedural rules, stating two privilege motions cannot be accepted on the same day. A privilege motion against CPI-M’s newspaper ‘Daily Desher Kath’ had already been accepted earlier.
- Chaos erupted during Zero Hour when CPI-M legislators protested and rushed to the Well of the House over rejection of their motion.
- Minister Nath denied any racist intent behind his remarks, claiming he referred only to CPI-M’s “mindset” and clarified he did not seek to hurt any tribe or community.
- Assembly proceedings have seen similar disruptions recently over alleged remarks and procedural objections from both sides.
Indian opinion Analysis
the ongoing tensions in Tripura’s political landscape highlight a growing strain between ruling and opposition parties in legislative processes. Allegations of “racist” language combined with disputes over procedural fairness raise questions about openness in assembly operations and respect for democratic norms. While adherence to legislative procedure is necessary, mutual trust among parties could prevent such escalations that disrupt parliamentary decorum and governance functions. Tribal representation-embodied here by LoP Jitendra Chaudhury-adds significance given its sensitivity in northeast Indian politics; claims revolving around perceived disrespect must be handled carefully while ensuring accountability without undermining established protocols.
Read More