Wildlife Conflicts Lower Landowners’ Support for Forests: Study

Quick Summary

• A study by the Center for Wildlife Studies (CWS) surveyed 699 landowners living within a five-kilometre buffer zone around Bandipur and Nagarahole National Parks.
• findings indicate that those who faced wildlife conflicts were:

– 116% less likely to enjoy living near forests.- 67% less likely to view forests as contributing to a pleasant environment.

• Education and income levels positively influenced perceptions of forest benefits, such as regulating climate and rainfall. However, inadequate local employment options may deter educated individuals from choosing forest-adjacent living.
• The study suggested offering local employment opportunities (tourism, agroforestry) and incentives for conservation efforts near forests.

Indian Opinion analysis

The findings highlight key tensions in conservation areas near national parks – balancing environmental goals with human livelihoods remains a challenge. Negative experiences stemming from wildlife conflicts show how crucial conflict mitigation strategies are for fostering harmonious coexistence between rural communities and protected ecosystems.

Furthermore,the correlation between education/income levels and positive perceptions of intangible ecosystem services indicates potential pathways for promoting conservation awareness through socio-economic empowerment programs in rural areas.

However, the expressed desire by many rural residents to relocate due to lack of local infrastructure underscores the need for targeted progress initiatives addressing gaps in employment opportunities while aligning livelihood generation with environmental goals – ensuring sustainability both socially and ecologically.

Link for read more: Indian Opinion