
Agricultural land in India is generally not a capital asset unless it falls within urban limits defined by population and distance from a municipality or cantonment board. For a reader who inherited…
Agricultural land in India is generally not a capital asset unless it falls within urban limits defined by population and distance from a municipality or cantonment board. For a reader who inherited such land 40-50 years ago, the tax expert Parizad Sirwalla of KPMG explains that only if the land qualifies as a capital asset does its sale generate taxable long-term capital gains (LTCG).

Section 54F of the Income-tax Act (Section 86 of the new Act) allows a deduction if the net sale consideration is reinvested in a residential house in India, subject to conditions. Section 54, which applies only to sale of a residential house, does not apply. Another option is Section 54B (Section 83 of the new Act), which offers a deduction if the proceeds are used to buy another agricultural land and other conditions are met.
The answer depends on the land's location and use. The reader must first check if the land is a capital asset, then evaluate which deduction applies.
Both SOURCE-1 and SOURCE-2 are identical in substance, both from livemint.com, carrying the same expert answer by KPMG's Parizad Sirwalla. The coverage is uniform straight reporting with no discernible slant. The story is purely a tax Q&A, not a policy or government story. The key takeaway is that inherited agricultural land may qualify for Section 54F house reinvestment deduction only if it is a capital asset under urban limits, and that Section 54 does not apply. A careful reader should verify the land's location against the population-distance table.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): livemint.com (neutral report), livemint.com (2) (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.