Allahabad HC refers IAS officer Durga Shakti Nagpal for criminal contempt

The Allahabad High Court has referred the conduct of senior IAS officer and Devipatan Divisional Commissioner Durga Shakti Nagpal to the court dealing with criminal contempt after a civil judge alleged she…

The Allahabad High Court has referred the conduct of senior IAS officer and Devipatan Divisional Commissioner Durga Shakti Nagpal to the court dealing with criminal contempt after a civil judge alleged she attempted to influence and intimidate her over a phone call regarding a pending land suit in Gonda.

Allahabad High Court refers IAS officer Durga Shakti Nagpal for criminal contempt

Civil Judge Shabina Khan told the district judge that Nagpal called her on July 15, 2026 while she was on leave and asked how long she would stay away, saying she was a senior IAS officer and threatening to complain to the High Court. The judge said the tone amounted to undue pressure. Nagpal said she only called to check on the judge's leave status because the case, pending since 1997, involved land needed for her office building, and she did not discuss the case.

Justice Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi said the tone gave a direct impression the presiding officer was being influenced and that courts cannot ignore insulting language used against a judicial officer. The district judge had already transferred the suit to another court, but the High Court directed the matter be placed before the appropriate contempt bench after directions from the chief justice.

Indian Opinion Analysis

LiveLaw and Hindustan Times led with the High Court's criminal contempt reference and its observation that the call struck at judicial independence, framing Nagpal's conduct as a serious attack on the judiciary. The Hindu ran two versions, one giving space to activist Amitabh Thakur's demand for a probe and Nagpal's alternate account that she only asked about leave. The divergence is between a judiciary-first framing and one that balances the official version with the officer's explanation. The contempt proceedings will test whether the call crossed the line from inquiry to intimidation.

Coverage: 4 sources, 2 government-critical, 2 neutral


Sources (4): livelaw.in (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (neutral report), thehindu.com (government critical), thehindu.com (2) (government critical)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 4 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.