
The Bombay High Court will hear on October 26 a petition by Bollywood actor Imran Khan challenging an FRRO notice directing him to leave India by October 28. The actor, a US citizen and OCI cardholder, has sought a stay on the order and asked the court to quash it.

The notice was issued after Khan was briefly detained on October 10 during a protest at August Kranti Maidan demanding the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. BJP leader Kirit Somaiya had approached the police, flagging Khan's alleged participation despite his US citizenship. Khan denies taking part in the protest, saying he was near the site but did not enter the gathering.
Separately, the FRRO has issued a show-cause notice asking Khan why his OCI registration should not be cancelled under Section 7D(e) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. The actor's legal team argues the authorities did not give him a hearing before issuing the leave India direction. The court may pass an interim order on October 26.
Bollywood Mascot frames the case as a procedural dispute, detailing Khan's arguments that he was denied a hearing, while also reporting the FRRO's grounds under the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025. India New England News leads with Khan's legal challenge and his claim that the FRRO failed to specify the violation, and also reports Somaiya's call for a Look Out Circular. Both outlets report the core facts neutrally. The difference lies in emphasis: Bollywood Mascot includes the OCI cancellation notice as a separate development, while India New England News foregrounds the lack of a specified violation in the FRRO order. The key point to watch is the High Court's interim order on October 26, just two days before the October 28 deadline.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): bollywoodmascot.com (neutral report), indianewengland.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.