CJI says allegations against Rajasthan acting CJ not for public adjudication

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said the allegations made by Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta against Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma cannot be adjudicated in the…

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said the allegations made by Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta against Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma cannot be adjudicated in the public domain and must be handled through institutional mechanisms. The CJI, who issued a press statement from Germany, said Justice Sharma must be given a fair opportunity to respond before any conclusion is reached.

CJI says allegations against Rajasthan acting CJ not for public adjudication

Justice Mehta wrote three letters to the CJI in August, accusing Justice Sharma of maladministration, malpractices, nepotism and favouritism. He alleged that Justice Sharma manipulated case listings to favour wealthy litigants, misused his roster powers, and threatened fellow judges with transfers by claiming proximity to the CJI. Justice Mehta urged the collegium to appoint a permanent chief justice from outside Rajasthan and transfer Justice Sharma out of the state. Justice Sharma has been acting chief justice for over 10 months and is due to retire on September 26.

The CJI said the collegium is already working on appointing chief justices in the remaining high courts. Any decision on Justice Sharma's continuation, transfer or other administrative action will be taken by the competent institutional authority after examining the material from both sides.

Indian Opinion Analysis

All three sources report the CJI's statement without slant, sticking to the institutional process frame rediff.com and barandbench.com lead with the CJI's refusal to adjudicate in public while thefederal.com foregrounds Justice Mehta's detailed allegations of threats to fellow judges. The sources agree on the core facts but thefederal.com gives more space to the complainant's account. The CJI has placed the matter within the collegium's internal process, which means no public timeline for a decision. Justice Sharma's retirement on September 26 is the de facto deadline for any transfer or replacement action.

Coverage: 3 sources, 3 neutral


Sources (3): rediff.com (neutral report), thefederal.com (neutral report), barandbench.com (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 3 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.