Criminal action can be taken against advocates practising without AIBE: Karnataka HC

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance33 minutes ago2 Views

The Story in Brief

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that advocates who continue to practise without clearing the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) within the mandatory two-year period can face criminal liability under the Indian Penal Code and Section 45 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Justice H.P. Sandesh held that the disciplinary mechanism of the Bar Council does not extinguish the jurisdiction of criminal courts to examine conduct that satisfies the ingredients of a criminal offence.

The court dismissed a petition by advocate M Prasanna Kumar, who sought to quash a cheating case registered on a private complaint. The complaint alleged that Kumar, provisionally enrolled in 2011, practised for nearly a decade without clearing the AIBE. The court noted that Kumar admitted he did not appear for the exam for almost a decade and only cleared it in 2021. The Karnataka State Bar Council opposed the plea, arguing that subsequent passing of the exam would not retrospectively validate his practice.

The High Court directed the KSBC to devise a mechanism to track advocates who fail to clear the AIBE within two years, ensuring that non-compliance is automatically flagged. The KSBC has 45 days to report back to the court.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Both livelaw.in and indianexpress.com reported the ruling factually, focusing on the court's direction to the KSBC to create a tracking mechanism and the 45-day deadline for compliance. The coverage is uniform straight reporting, with no discernible editorial slant from either outlet. The key legal point, that criminal jurisdiction is not barred by the Bar Council's disciplinary powers, is stated identically. The court's criticism of the advocate's decade-long practice without the exam is also reported verbatim. The implications for other provisionally enrolled advocates across the state are left open by the court's directive to the KSBC.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): livelaw.in (neutral report), indianexpress.com (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.