
The Delhi high court has held that a live-in relationship between consenting adults is akin to marriage, and parents or friends cannot interfere with their choice or threaten their lives. Justice Saurabh…
The Delhi high court has held that a live-in relationship between consenting adults is akin to marriage, and parents or friends cannot interfere with their choice or threaten their lives. Justice Saurabh Banerjee granted police protection to a couple in their 30s who faced threats from the woman's family.

The court observed that as consenting adults, they had all rights to choose and reside with a partner of their choice without interference. The judge noted that marriages are recognised regardless of caste, creed, colour, religion or faith, and curtailing fundamental rights by societal morals and prejudices was a deprivation of individual identity.
The couple told the court they had lived together for a while and intended to marry. The woman's father and brother allegedly opposed the relationship and threatened violence. The couple said they approached the local police but no action was taken. The court noted live-in relationships have sanctity in law, recognised under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
This ruling reinforces a consistent line of high court judgments that treat live-in relationships as a constitutionally protected choice, not a crime or social deviance. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 already extends maintenance and protection rights to women in live-in relationships. What is at stake here is the practical enforcement of these rights against family pressure. The key next step is whether the police will comply with the court's protection order and register a case if the family persists with threats. Similar petitions have surged in Delhi courts in recent years, reflecting changing social patterns among urban professionals.
Source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.