Former CDS says Kirana Hills strike was unintentional loitering munition hit

Former Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan has said India's strike on Pakistan's Kirana Hills during Operation Sindoor was likely unintentional. Speaking at a VIMARSH event on Tuesday, Chauhan said an…

Former Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan has said India's strike on Pakistan's Kirana Hills during Operation Sindoor was likely unintentional. Speaking at a VIMARSH event on Tuesday, Chauhan said an Indian loitering munition searching for radars near Sargodha may have run out of fuel and hit the hills, which are linked to Pakistan's nuclear facilities. He said the munitions had a two-hour loitering duration and would descend onto a location if they found no target.

Former CDS says Kirana Hills strike was unintentional loitering munition hit

Chauhan's remarks differ from a statement made last year by former Air Marshal AK Bharti, who had denied that Indian forces targeted any nuclear facility at Kirana Hills. Chauhan also recounted that he approved an Air Chief's request to strike Sargodha after Pakistan sought talks, but that the plan was later changed to Bholari due to bad weather. He said Operation Sindoor remains relevant over a year after its active phase ended and that military planners must weigh operational risk against political objectives.

Indian Opinion Analysis

India has never officially acknowledged nuclear-related targets inside Pakistan. The Kirana Hills site is among several Pakistani facilities that Indian intelligence lists as nuclear-capable, though its exact role is publicly unknown. Under international norms, striking another state's nuclear infrastructure carries escalation risks that no nuclear-armed state has tested since the 1981 Osirak raid. The question for Indian planners now is not whether one loitering munition landed on a hilltop, but what automated weapons do when they fail to find their intended target: a procedural gap every armed force with loitering munitions faces. The military will have to decide whether two hours of autonomous search with no failsafe beyond a random descent is an acceptable operational risk or a vulnerability to fix before the next conflict.


Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com

This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.