Former SC judge challenges Rajasthan HC criticism of arbitral tribunal

Former SC Judge Moves Supreme Court Against Rajasthan HC Calling Tribunal Headed By Him ‘Lethargic’, Reducing Arbitral Fee

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Deepak Verma and two retired High Court judges have moved the Supreme Court against a Rajasthan High Court order criticising their arbitral tribunal as “lethargic” and reducing…

The Story in Brief

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Deepak Verma and two retired High Court judges have moved the Supreme Court against a Rajasthan High Court order criticising their arbitral tribunal as “lethargic” and reducing fees for delays. The matter is listed before Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana.

Former SC judge challenges Rajasthan HC criticism of arbitral tribunal

The dispute involves HCL Infosystems and three Rajasthan power distribution companies over 2009 contracts. The High Court said the arbitration had exceeded statutory timelines, with more than 160 sittings and costs nearing Rs. 13 crore. It directed day-to-day hearings in Jaipur from 31 May 2026 and completion within 45 days. The tribunal had cited technical complexity, 22 witnesses, extensive records and Covid-19 disruptions.

The Indian Opinion

The case should not be reduced to a clash between judicial criticism and tribunal dignity. Long arbitrations impose real costs, but complex records and witness evidence can require time. The Rs. 7.5 lakh per-session fee and nearly Rs. 13 crore expenditure make the High Court’s concern understandable, while the tribunal’s explanation also deserves a proper hearing. The Supreme Court’s approach to fee reductions and the 45-day completion direction will be the concrete test.


Source: livelaw.in

This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.