Now Reading: Gavaskar backs Gambhir, Gill on Axar Patel No.5 call
-
01
Gavaskar backs Gambhir, Gill on Axar Patel No.5 call
The Story in Brief
Sunil Gavaskar has defended the decision by head coach Gautam Gambhir and captain Shubman Gill to send Axar Patel in at No.5 ahead of KL Rahul during India's second ODI against New Zealand on 8 November in Wellington, despite Axar falling for seven runs. India, chasing 135, were 39/3 after losing Shubman Gill, Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma, and slipped to 47/4 when Axar departed.
Speaking on Sony Sports Network, Gavaskar said the tactical thinking was sound, explaining that introducing a left-handed batter disrupts a bowling attack's line and length. 'There was nothing wrong with that thought process,' he said, adding that such moves should not be judged solely by results. Axar had previously batted at No.5 during India's Champions Trophy 2025 campaign and the 2024 T20 World Cup final. KL Rahul and Shreyas Iyer (30) steadied the chase before rain stopped play at 113/7 after 26 overs, with India winning by four runs via the DLS method to take a 2-0 series lead.
Update, 8 November 2026: Crictracker now also reports the story, confirming Gavaskar's defence of Gambhir and Gill's decision to send Axar Patel at No.5, and adding that Axar batted at that position in the T20 World Cup 2024 final. It states Shubman Gill fell for a golden duck to Jacob Duffy in the second over.
Indian Opinion Analysis
All three outlets present the same core narrative: Gavaskar defended Gambhir and Gill's decision to send Axar at No.5, citing the tactical advantage of a left-handed batter disrupting line and length. Times of India, Times Now and Crictracker each include Gavaskar's full reasoning and the context of Axar's prior use at that position. The coverage is uniform straight reporting with no editorial slant. The sources agree on match details: India chased 135, won by four runs via DLS, and lead the series 2-0. The next fixture in the five-match series is the third ODI.
Coverage: 3 sources, 3 neutral
Sources (3): timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), timesnownews.com (neutral report), crictracker.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 3 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.
