Haryana disputes 30,000 stilt+4 approvals claim in HC

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance33 minutes ago1 Views

The Story in Brief

The Haryana Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) has told the Punjab and Haryana High Court that over 60% of the 15,447 stilt-plus-four-floor (S+4) building plans approved in Gurgaon-Manesar’s licensed colonies were cleared before July 2024, disputing a petitioner’s claim that nearly 30,000 approvals came after that date. In an affidavit filed on 14 October, DTCP Director General Dr J Ganesan opposed a plea to halt S+4 construction and occupation certificates (OCs), calling the petitioner’s figure ‘factually incorrect’.

Haryana disputes 30,000 stilt+4 approvals claim in HC

The Times of India reports that of 15,447 plans in the Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex, 9,625 (62.3%) were approved up to 1 July 2024 under earlier policies, and 5,822 (37.7%) between 2 July 2024 and the high court’s stay on 2 April 2026. The Indian Express adds that across Gurugram, total permissions stood at 32,024, with 18,719 in private licensed colonies and 13,305 in HSVP sectors. Across Haryana, 35,021 permissions were granted, Gurugram accounting for over 91%.

The department said violations are dealt with case by case under Section 10 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, and that a blanket ban is unjustified. It also said HSVP has framed a standard operating procedure for sector-wise capacity audits of water, sewerage, power and roads. The matter is pending before the high court.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Both sources offer straight, factual reporting of the DTCP affidavit, with near-identical core figures: 15,447 plans in Gurgaon-Manesar, 62.3% pre-July 2024. The Indian Express adds a broader Gurugram total of 32,024 permissions and mentions RWA protests, giving slightly more context. The Times of India sticks closely to the court filing. Neither outlet frames the story as pro-government or critical, both treat the affidavit as official record. The key dispute, 30,000 approvals claimed versus 5,822 shown, is reported without judgement. The next development will be the high court’s ruling on the petitioner’s application.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), indianexpress.com (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.