Jharkhand High Court stays order cancelling JPSC exams and appointments

The Jharkhand High Court on Thursday stayed the state government's notification cancelling appointments made through the 11th to 13th JPSC examinations and the recruitment of food safety officers. The court observed that the cancellation violated the principles of natural justice, as candidates were not given a hearing before the order. The matter will be heard next on September 15, with the court directing the state to file its reply.

Jharkhand HC stays order cancelling JPSC exam appointments

The Soren government had cancelled 22 recruitment exams and ordered probes into 23 others following student protests over alleged irregularities. Chief Minister Hemant Soren had announced the cancellation of the JSSC-CGL exam and all tests conducted by TSR Data Processing Pvt Ltd since 2014. An exam reforms committee headed by IAS officer Amitabh Kaushal was also constituted.

Around 450 candidates who had already joined government service were affected by the cancellation, leading to counter-protests. Petitioners argued that action should be taken only against those found guilty, not all successful candidates. The stay provides interim relief, with candidates directed to resume duty.

Indian Opinion Analysis

All six sources report the same core fact, the High Court stay, but diverge in framing. Pro-government framings, such as in Swarajya Mag, emphasise the student protests that originally demanded cancellation, and the court intervention as halting the government's order. Government-critical framings, like in ABP Live and The New Indian Express, highlight the petitioners' argument of unilateral action and the loss of jobs for successful candidates. The Hindu and Hindustan Times stick to neutral reportage, leading with the court order. A careful reader should note that the court stayed only two notifications (11th-13th JPSC and food safety officers), not all 22 cancellations. The wider probe into 23 other exams and the reforms committee continue. Watch for the September 15 hearing, which will determine whether the stay becomes permanent.

Coverage: 6 sources, 1 pro-government, 2 government-critical, 3 neutral


Sources (6): hindustantimes.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report), thehindu.com (neutral report), news.abplive.com (government critical), newindianexpress.com (government critical), swarajyamag.com (pro government)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 6 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.

Updated: this story now draws on 6 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.