M. Geethanandan, the social activist sentenced to five years for attempting to murder a police officer during the 2003 Muthanga agitation, has said the eviction was a bid to crush the Adivasi…
M. Geethanandan, the social activist sentenced to five years for attempting to murder a police officer during the 2003 Muthanga agitation, has said the eviction was a bid to crush the Adivasi movement. In an interview after being granted bail by the Kerala High Court, he alleged that the state mobilised the police to attack unarmed tribal protesters and that an NHRC-ordered independent inquiry never took place.
Geethanandan argued that the 23-year trial treated the agitation as a criminal case rather than a land rights struggle. He pointed to a 2001 agreement with the UDF government to provide land to landless Adivasis through a resettlement mission, which he said was not properly implemented, leading to the land occupation at Muthanga Wildlife Sanctuary. Two people died in the ensuing violence: police constable K.V. Vinod and Adivasi community member Yogi.
The Kalpetta court acquitted all accused in the Vinod murder case last month but sentenced Geethanandan and three others for attempted murder of another officer. Geethanandan said political factors, including a Global Investors Meet, influenced the decision to evict the protesters. He maintained the protest involved no weapons and that the police used revolvers and rifles against them.
The Muthanga trial verdict leaves untouched the core grievance that triggered the agitation: the non-implementation of the 2001 rehabilitation package, which promised land to landless Adivasi families through the Tribal Resettlement and Development Mission. Kerala's Adivasi population, around 1.5 percent of the state's people, remain among its poorest, with landlessness a persistent issue despite successive governments. The case also highlights the tension between judicial process and political movements: a 23-year trial examined individual criminal acts but never the state's counter-action, which the NHRC called for. The next marker to watch is whether the Kerala High Court, which suspended Geethanandan's sentence, will now hear the state's appeal against the acquittals in the Vinod murder case, or whether the Assembly's Adivasi sub-plan will receive the funds allocated under the revised 2022-23 budget.
Source: thehindu.com
This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.