
The Rajasthan High Court has barred all courts in the state from granting protection to any person or officer allegedly responsible for structural defects in its Jodhpur building. A division bench of Dr Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Rekha Borana ruled that any such protection order shall be deemed ineffective unless passed by the division bench or the Supreme Court. The court warned it would view any order impeding investigation with utmost seriousness.

The court was acting on a suo moto case concerning structural defects in the central dome and other parts of the building. It noted a report from IIT Bombay dated August 20, 2026, that the dome was repairable but required time-bound restoration under the National Building Code, 2005. The court also criticised the managing director of RSRDC for an unduly casual manner and lack of awareness about chloride ingress and other defects. The matter has been listed for September 15, 2026.
The High Court's blanket bar on protection orders is an extraordinary assertion of judicial authority, effectively overriding trial courts and magistrates in a specific set of cases. Structural failures in government buildings have been a recurring issue across Indian states, often linked to poor materials, delayed audits, and lack of accountability. Here, the court has tied the investigation to a concrete timeline, with officials required to present action taken reports and a rehabilitation plan. The next hearing on September 15 will determine whether contempt proceedings are initiated against officers found derelict.
Under the Rajasthan High Court rules, a division bench can issue binding directions to subordinate courts. By invoking its inherent powers to protect life and property, the bench has created a precedent that could influence how other high courts handle building safety cases.
Source: livelaw.in
This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above. Methodology and corrections.