
The Supreme Court has directed magistrates across India to conduct a mandatory ‘threshold inquiry’ for every adult woman rescued during anti-trafficking operations, even if she says her work is voluntary, to distinguish trafficking victims from voluntary sex workers. The court asked the National Judicial Academy to frame a uniform protocol for this process under Section 17 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.

The directions, issued by justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on 13 October 2026, build on the court's 29 May judgment in a 2004 PIL by NGO Prajwala. The court found that several states and union territories had not fully complied with four additional directions from the May ruling, including notifying Anti-Human Trafficking Units as police stations. The Centre must submit a fresh compliance report before the next hearing.
The two outlets report identically on the Supreme Court's direction for a mandatory threshold inquiry and the request to the National Judicial Academy for guidelines. Both note that the government's own status report showed incomplete compliance with four additional directions from the May judgment. There is no divergence in framing: Hindustan Times and Lawbeat both present the court's concerns and the next steps without editorial slant. The coverage is uniform straight reporting. The concrete next step is the Centre's fresh compliance report due before the next hearing.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): hindustantimes.com (neutral report), lawbeat.in (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.