Now Reading: SC rejects Uddhav camp plea to disqualify rebel MLAs
-
01
SC rejects Uddhav camp plea to disqualify rebel MLAs
The Supreme Court on Wednesday told the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) that it cannot assume the Speaker's role and decide disqualification petitions against rebel MLAs itself. A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana was hearing Thackeray faction pleas against the Election Commission's decision to recognise the Eknath Shinde camp as the real Shiv Sena and allot it the bow-and-arrow symbol.
Justice Bagchi said the court can at best set aside an erroneous speaker order and direct a fresh adjudication. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued the speaker had conflated legislative majority with the political party itself, and the EC's symbol determination should follow disqualification proceedings. The court is hearing the seventh day of final arguments, Shinde faction lawyers will present their case from Thursday.
Indian Opinion Analysis
Rediff.com led with the Uddhav camp's core legal argument: disqualification must precede the EC's symbol decision. Times of India led with the bench's sharp pushback, the court cannot 'assume the Speaker's role'. Rediff.com gives more space to Sibal's procedural point that EC action would bypass anti-defection law, ToI foregrounds Justice Bagchi's exact words limiting the court's remedy. Neither outlet adopts an editorial stance, both report arguments faithfully. The measured read: the court is signalling it will not itself disqualify MLAs, reducing the Uddhav camp's best outcome to a fresh Speaker hearing. Watch Wednesday's argument by the Shinde faction lawyers.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): rediff.com (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.
