Now Reading: UP police acts above law, Allahabad HC raps force
-
01
UP police acts above law, Allahabad HC raps force
The Allahabad High Court has declared the detention of a man in Gautam Buddh Nagar illegal, ruling that the Uttar Pradesh police detained him before an FIR was registered. A division bench of Justices Atul Shridharan and Achal Sachdev said the police appear to consider themselves above the law and directed the immediate release of petitioner Deepak if he is not wanted in any other case.
The court found that Deepak and four others were taken into custody under BNSS sections on 23 August 2026 at 7:34 pm, but the FIR was lodged only at 9:39 pm that night. Formal arrest was shown the next day. The bench noted date discrepancies in seizure documents and a blank amount column in a bond, and observed that documents appeared to have been filled in later. It rejected the state's argument that a tense situation justified the procedural lapses, saying police cannot be freed from legal obligations.
The court directed that its displeasure be recorded in the service records of Assistant Commissioner of Police Kamlesh Kant and investigating officer Anuj Kumar, and urged the DGP to prepare better training modules to sensitise officers to civil liberties.
Indian Opinion Analysis
Both Aaj Tak and TV9 Hindi report the same core facts and quotes, giving the story uniform straight coverage. Aaj Tak leads with the court's rebuke that the police 'consider themselves above the law', while TV9 Hindi adds the stronger phrase 'running its own law' and names the two officers the court criticised, noting the direction to record displeasure in their service files. Neither outlet omits the court's rejection of the state's justification about a tense situation. The balanced reading is that the court found clear procedural violations and ordered immediate release, with the only open question being whether the DGP's promised training modules will address systemic failures.
The court ordered release if Deepak is not wanted in another case.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): aajtak.in (neutral report), tv9hindi.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.
