Now Reading: US judge strikes down Trump visa ban on 75 countries
-
01
US judge strikes down Trump visa ban on 75 countries
A federal judge in Manhattan has struck down the Trump administration's suspension of immigrant visas for nationals from 75 countries, ruling the policy exceeded Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statutory authority. Judge…
A federal judge in Manhattan has struck down the Trump administration's suspension of immigrant visas for nationals from 75 countries, ruling the policy exceeded Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statutory authority. Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Southern District of New York on Friday called the policy 'patently unlawful' and 'contrary to law', saying it conflicted with federal immigration law that strips the secretary of state of authority over consular officers' visa adjudication.
The policy, which took effect in January 2025, affected applicants from countries including Brazil, Colombia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and many African and Middle Eastern nations. The State Department said the ban targeted countries whose nationals were at high risk of becoming a 'public charge'. Vargas's ruling vacates any visa denial based solely on the policy. The Trump administration is expected to appeal.
The lawsuit was filed by immigrant rights groups Catholic Legal Immigration Network and African Communities Together, along with visa applicants and US citizens sponsoring family members from the designated countries. Rights groups have argued the crackdown violates free speech and due process rights, and raises concerns about racial profiling.
Indian Opinion Analysis
Al Jazeera leads with the judge's 'patently unlawful' language and details the lawsuit by immigrant rights groups, framing the ban as an overreach and a violation of statutory law. Hindustan Times leads with the headline 'Contrary to law' and focuses on the policy's scope and the expected appeal, giving more weight to the administration's stated rationale of preventing welfare use. Al Jazeera provides greater context on rights groups' objections, while Hindustan Times emphasises the political angle of Trump's anti-immigration campaign. The measured read: the ruling is a clear legal rebuke but the administration will likely appeal, prolonging uncertainty for affected applicants. Watch for the appeals court's next step.
Coverage: 2 sources, 1 government-critical, 1 neutral
Sources (2): aljazeera.com (government critical), hindustantimes.com (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.
