
A 26-year-old Bengaluru woman, Harini, was arrested for allegedly murdering her husband Abhinandan, 35, and their five-year-old son Yaduveer at their home in Chikkabanavara on Sunday night, with the help of her lover Vinay. Police said Harini called the control room on Monday morning claiming she found the two dead, but inconsistencies in her account led to a six-hour interrogation and confession.

According to police, Harini had been having an affair with Vinay, whom she met on Snapchat in December 2024. The couple had frequent fights, and Harini had been asking for a divorce. On Sunday night, after the family returned home, Harini allegedly let Vinay into the house. They smothered Abhinandan as he slept. When Yaduveer woke up and witnessed the act, Harini allegedly strangled him. Investigators noted that CCTV cameras had been switched off after 10pm and that Harini had wiped her phone's data.
Times of India reports that police are also probing whether property worth crores owned by Abhinandan, a three-storey building, was a motive. Hindustan Times says the killing of the child was not planned but done to eliminate a witness. Vinay has been taken into custody. The postmortem report is awaited.
Both outlets report the same shocking double murder, but their framings differ sharply. Hindustan Times leads with the sensational human-interest angle: the affair, Bigg Boss, and the lover's role, presented as a dramatic narrative. Times of India focuses on forensic details, switched-off CCTV, wiped phone, washed blood-stained clothes, and introduces property worth crores as a possible motive, lending a more investigative, evidence-led frame. Neither outlet questions the police account. The careful reader should note that the property motive in TOI is presented as police suspicion, not confirmed fact, while HT's timeline relies heavily on unnamed police sources. The postmortem report, awaited, will be the next concrete check on these claims.
Coverage: 2 sources, 1 neutral, 1 sensationalist
Sources (2): hindustantimes.com (sensationalist), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.