Centre to amend BIT, cut local remedy wait for foreign investors

The government is set to amend India's model bilateral investment treaty (BIT) to allow international arbitration after one year of exhausting local remedies, instead of the current five-year clause, according to a…

The government is set to amend India's model bilateral investment treaty (BIT) to allow international arbitration after one year of exhausting local remedies, instead of the current five-year clause, according to a finance ministry cabinet note seen by the Times of India. The note also proposes expanding the definition of investment from enterprise-based to asset-based, covering shares and equity instruments held for five years or more. The move aims to address a long-pending grievance of overseas investors, the report said.

Centre to amend BIT, cut local remedy wait for foreign investors

The current five-year period was introduced in 2015 after India faced a record number of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) claims, including a loss to Australian firm White Industries. That revision led to India unilaterally terminating most of its BITs, and since 2018 only six countries have signed new BITs with India. The proposed changes would also include carve-outs for subsidies, local government measures, and compulsory licensing during public health emergencies.

In contrast, a commentary on Swarajya Magazine argues that India is waging a systematic war on arbitration through legislative, executive, and judicial overreach, damaging investor confidence despite government claims of improving ease of doing business. The article says the state's undermining of the arbitration framework has been collaborative and exhaustive, contradicting the government's stated goals.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The Times of India frames the BIT amendment as a pragmatic government move to attract foreign investment, reporting internal consensus and quoting officials. Swarajya Magazine frames the same government as actively hostile to arbitration, accusing it of systematic institutional sabotage. The Times omits the broader critique of judicial overreach, Swarajya omits the concrete cabinet action that addresses investor concerns. The measured read: the government is simultaneously tightening regulatory control and making tactical concessions. Watch for cabinet approval and the final arbitration wait period.

Coverage: 2 sources, 1 government-critical, 1 neutral


Sources (2): swarajyamag.com (government critical), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.