
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said on Wednesday that allegations against a sitting judge cannot be treated as a finding. The statement comes after Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote…
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said on Wednesday that allegations against a sitting judge cannot be treated as a finding. The statement comes after Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote three letters urging the collegium to remove Rajasthan High Court acting chief justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, accusing him of corruption, nepotism, and misuse of roster powers.

CJI Kant said the matter is being examined at the appropriate level and that Justice Sharma deserves a fair chance to respond. The Hindustan Times reports that the CJI stressed the need for due process, while the Deccan Herald quotes him saying mere accusations do not amount to established guilt. Any decision on Justice Sharma's continuation or transfer will be taken by the competent authority after due consideration.
Both sources report the CJI's statement neutrally, but the Hindustan Times includes fuller detail on Justice Mehta's allegations, while the Deccan Herald leads with the CJI's due-process remark. The CJI's emphasis on institutional process neither confirms nor denies the charges, leaving the collegium's next administrative step as the key watchpoint. The Rajasthan High Court's acting chief justice remains in place until a decision is announced.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): hindustantimes.com (neutral report), deccanherald.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry.