
The DMK's mouthpiece Murasoli published an editorial criticising Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay for exchanging greetings with actress Trisha Krishnan at the 80th Independence Day celebrations at Fort St George in Chennai. The editorial described the exchange as a display of "vulgarity" and said even voters who supported him found it hard to stomach. It also criticised his appeal for public support and his appointment of film industry figures to administrative roles, alleging that producers of his films were being placed in key positions.

The editorial also raised concerns about law and order under Vijay's government, citing a recent lynching of a 19-year-old student in Coimbatore. Actor Sanjjanaa Galrani defended Trisha, questioning why the focus had shifted to her rather than Vijay's governance, and urged respect for her privacy. The BJP criticised the DMK's remarks, comparing them to past attacks on former CM J Jayalalithaa, who was also an actress.
Neither Vijay nor his party TVK had responded to the editorial at the time of reporting. Trisha had attended the event seated next to Vijay's parents, and speculation about her relationship with him has continued amid divorce proceedings filed by Vijay's estranged wife Sangeetha Sornalingam, who later withdrew her petition.
The first source frames the DMK's editorial as a political attack on Vijay, emphasising its harsh language and listing allegations from law and order to nepotism, while balancing it with the BJP's defence of Trisha. The second source shifts to celebrity defence, focusing on Sanjjanaa Galrani's call to separate Trisha from criticism of Vijay's governance, without engaging with the DMK's substantive charges. The coverage is polarised: the political angle is foregrounded in one, the personal and gender-angle defence in the other. A careful reader should note that neither source critically examines the DMK's claims about appointments or law and order on their merits. The next development to watch is whether Vijay or TVK issues an official response to the editorial.
Coverage: 2 sources, 1 neutral, 1 sensationalist
Sources (2): hindustantimes.com (sensationalist), hindustantimes.com (2) (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.