FSSAI issues notices to Nestle India, HUL over misleading claims

Indian Opinion DeskIndian Opinion DeskGovernance4 minutes ago1 Views

The Story in Brief

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued notices to Nestle India and Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) over misleading claims and non-compliance on packaging of food products. In a social media post on Saturday (17 October 2026), the regulator flagged claims on HUL's Horlicks Women's Plus Chocolate Nutrition Drink, including 'Nutrition for Strong Bones' and 'Clinically Proven to Help Improve Bone Strength in 6 Months', as misleading. The claim of 'No Added Sugar' was also questioned due to the presence of maltodextrin in the product.

FSSAI issues notices to Nestle India, HUL over misleading claims

Separately, FSSAI flagged HUL's Horlicks Mother's Plus Kesar for the claim 'Healthy Birth Weight', saying it contravenes regulations. On Nestle India, the regulator flagged inconsistencies in its Nescafe Ready-to-Drink products, where packaging described the items as 'Flavoured Milk' on the front but 'Proprietary Food – Dairy Based Drink' on the back. The regulator also said Nestle's Resource Renal Vanilla Flavour Powder, meant for dietary management of chronic kidney disease, lacked prior approval and did not state vegetarian or non-vegetarian status.

HUL said in an emailed response that its products comply with all requirements and that it will share 'scientific and regulatory evidence' with authorities. Nestle India did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Sunday (18 October 2026). FSSAI has directed both companies to submit responses within the stipulated period and warned of further action if replies are not satisfactory.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Fortune India leads with the FSSAI's own social media post and details every contravention cited, sticking to a straight neutral-report format. Livemint also follows neutral-report style but adds HUL's denial and a broader context of the regulator's crackdown over recent months, including prior action against Nestle in September. Both sources cover the same violations without conflict on facts. The balanced reading is that the story is a regulatory notice, with HUL offering a defence and Nestle yet to respond, the concrete next step is the companies' deadline to reply, beyond which FSSAI has warned of further action.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): fortuneindia.com (neutral report), livemint.com (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.