
The Karnataka High Court has allowed a man to meet his four-year-old child, rejecting his estranged wife's argument that visitation should be barred because he had not paid maintenance. Justice Rajeshwari N. Hegde heard the wife's petition challenging a trial court order that had permitted the husband bi-monthly visits and daily video calls.

The wife argued that the husband had unilaterally split the Rs 60,000 monthly maintenance, paying only Rs 25,000 for the child. The husband submitted an affidavit stating he had paid the child's maintenance in full. The court observed that the father cannot be denied the opportunity to maintain a relationship with his child and that the welfare of the child is paramount.
The High Court modified the trial court order, allowing the father to meet the child for up to three days a month on weekends or public holidays, attend school events, and spend 10 days during summer vacation. The permission for daily video calls was withdrawn.
Livelaw's report frames the judgment as a straightforward rejection of a wife's plea, leading with the court's decision and quoting the husband's affidavit that maintenance was paid. The coverage omits the wife's detailed allegations. The story is a straight news report with no discernible slant, focusing on the legal outcome and the court's reasoning that a child's welfare overrides maintenance disputes. The next step is the modified visitation schedule now in effect.
Coverage: 2 sources, 1 neutral
Sources (2): livelaw.in (neutral report), verdictum.in
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.