
Kochi-based doctor Johnson K Varghese, 41, has denied sexual assault charges and argued in an anticipatory bail petition before the Ernakulam District and Sessions Court that voluntary alcohol consumption and sharing a hotel room do not by themselves establish rape. The FIR was registered by Infopark police on November 6 under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Varghese claims the case is a ‘counterblast’ to his own complaint accusing 12 people, including actress Athulya Chandra, of assaulting him and demanding Rs 3 crore at a Kadavanthra flat on November 2.

The complainant, a 50-year-old woman, stated in her First Information Statement that on October 10 the doctor met her at a hotel in Kakkanad, they consumed alcohol, and he later sexually assaulted her in a hotel room. The Ernakulam First Class Magistrate denied bail to Chandra and Bipin Perumpally on November 7 in the separate case. Kochi police issued a lookout notice against Varghese on November 8 after he went absconding, and private videos of several women were found on his phone, The News Minute reports.
Update, 9 November 2026: NDTV now reports that the doctor, who has been evading arrest, denies sexually assaulting the woman and maintains she was a long-time patient with whom he shared a close friendship. This matches the Onmanorama report on his bail petition. The News Minute and LiveLaw have no new facts beyond their earlier reports.
Onmanorama and NDTV both centre the doctor's denial and his claim that the case is a ‘counterblast’ to his own extortion complaint, foregrounding his bail petition's argument that voluntary drinking and hotel sharing do not alone amount to rape. The News Minute and LiveLaw, in contrast, lead with the police action against the doctor: The News Minute reports that a lookout notice was issued on November 8 and that private videos of women were found on his phone, while LiveLaw focuses solely on the denial of bail to the actors Athulya Chandra and Bipin Perumpally in the separate case that the doctor initiated. The two sets of outlets thus cover the same web of litigation but emphasise opposite sides: one the accused doctor's defence, the other the complainant's case and the police response. The balanced reading is that both FIRs are pending judicial scrutiny, with the doctor's anticipatory bail plea next to be heard.
Coverage: 4 sources, 4 neutral
Sources (4): onmanorama.com (neutral report), thenewsminute.com (neutral report), livelaw.in (neutral report), ndtv.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.