
Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) spokesperson Saurav Das have questioned the legality of the Delhi High Court's decision to exempt lawyers and court staff from the ban on older vehicles entering the national capital. The exemption, granted by Justice Amit Mahajan on Friday (6 November 2026), applies on court working days to vehicles registered outside Delhi that do not meet BS-VI emission standards.

The order came on a petition by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA), which argued that advocates from NCR cities such as Gurugram, Faridabad, Noida and Ghaziabad needed to travel to Delhi for judicial work. DHCBA president N Hariharan said a complete ban would hinder court functioning. Moitra posted on X: 'How is this legal? Has the Delhi High Court completely lost the plot?' Das wrote: 'Equality before the law is now RIP!' The Delhi government had on 23 June barred non-BS-VI vehicles from entering the capital from 1 November to 31 January to curb pollution.
Both Mathrubhumi and Livemint report the same facts and quotes from Moitra and Das, with uniform neutral coverage of the court order and the bar association's justification. Neither outlet adopts a pro-government or government-critical frame, they present the criticism and the legal rationale side by side. The coverage is straight reporting of a controversy, with no editorial slant. The key open point is whether the Delhi government or environmental groups will challenge the exemption, though neither source names a next step.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): mathrubhumi.com (neutral report), livemint.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.