
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench, has set aside orders denying an OBC certificate to Ragini Rathore, daughter of a district judge, and directed the competent authority to reconsider her application afresh. Justice Milind Ramesh Phadke passed the order on Wednesday, 29 September 2026.
The authorities had rejected Rathore's application in October 2020 solely because her father's gross salary income of Rs 16,99,282 exceeded the creamy layer ceiling. The High Court observed that creamy layer status cannot be determined by income alone and that the nature of employment, promotion date, and service-category rules must be examined, citing the Supreme Court's March 2026 judgment in Union of India v. Rohith Nathan.
The court has directed the authority to pass a reasoned order within six weeks after hearing the petitioner. Sambadenglish.com and Free Press Journal both report the case has been remanded to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Isagarh, for fresh consideration.
Both Sambadenglish and Free Press Journal offer neutral, court-centred reporting of the Madhya Pradesh High Court order, though Free Press Journal leads with the petitioner's father being a district judge, while Sambadenglish leads with the legal principle that creamy layer status cannot be decided by income alone. Sambadenglish provides more detail on the petitioner's argument that salary income alone is not the sole criterion, citing the Supreme Court's March 2026 Rohith Nathan judgment. Free Press Journal quotes the petitioner's lawyer on the same point. The coverage is uniform in its factual reporting, with no discernible slant. The key next step is the competent authority's decision within six weeks.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): sambadenglish.com (neutral report), freepressjournal.in (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.