
The Supreme Court will decide the plea of Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea and other telecom operators seeking release of Rs 3,300 crore in bank guarantees. A bench led by Justice BV Nagarathna on Tuesday refused to direct the government to act, noting it has not stayed the Bombay High Court's June 8 order that set aside retrospective one-time spectrum charge (OTSC) demands for the 2008-2012 period.

The Bombay High Court had held the government failed to justify levying OTSC retrospectively. The government has challenged that ruling, telling the Supreme Court the high court erroneously quashed decisions taken after Union Cabinet approval in 2012. Until the apex court decides, the government can on its own release the guarantees.
In a separate judgment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the GST department's review petition against last year's ruling that telecom towers are movable property eligible for input tax credit. The court found no error in its August 2024 order, giving permanent relief to telecom firms on tax credit for tower infrastructure.
The three stories from The Economic Times are uniform straight reporting with no discernible slant. One covers the Supreme Court hearing on the release of Rs 3,300 crore in bank guarantees, a second reports the same hearing with identical text, and a third is an unrelated verdict on input tax credit for telecom towers. The first two frame the matter as a legal process: the court has not stayed the Bombay High Court ruling that struck down retrospective spectrum charges, so the government could release the guarantees voluntarily. Neither story adopts a pro-government or critical stance. The third story treats a separate GST judgment as a sector relief without editorialising. A careful reader should conclude that the court has left the ball in the government's court: the executive can act on the high court order, or wait for the Supreme Court to decide the government's appeal. What to watch: whether the government releases the bank guarantees before the next hearing date.
Coverage: 3 sources, 3 neutral
Sources (3): economictimes.indiatimes.com (neutral report), telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com (neutral report), legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com (neutral report)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 3 sources linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Updated: this story now draws on 3 sources.