
Three defence offices were unable to identify the authority holding records on the appointment of the Chief of Air Staff, and the Defence Ministry invoked national security to deny details of the selection process, according to an RTI reply made public on 4 November. The applicant had sought the names of officers considered for the post after Air Chief Marshal B S Dhanoa’s retirement and the policy governing service chief appointments.

The Ministry denied the information under Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act, a decision upheld by the Central Information Commission. The RTI application, filed on 25 March 2024, moved from the Department of Defence to the Department of Military Affairs and then to Air Headquarters, none of which held the records. An official described the sequence as ‘unfortunate’. The AF/Policy wing eventually denied access on national security grounds.
Update, 4 November 2026: The same facts now also reported by dtnext.in. No new facts added: all four outlets carry identical wire-copy coverage of the RTI reply and the CIC ruling.
The four outlets report identical facts from the RTI reply: three defence offices failed to trace records on the Air Chief appointment, and the ministry cited national security to deny the information, a sequence several officials termed ‘unfortunate’. All sources are neutral wire copy with uniform coverage. The story’s significance lies in what it shows: even internal defence wings could not identify who holds appointment records. The Central Information Commission upheld the denial under Section 8(1)(a). No source challenges the ruling or adds opposition comment, so the balanced reading is that the episode exposes a procedural gap in record-keeping rather than a policy dispute.
Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral
Sources (2): Syndicated copy (carried by assamtribune.com, deccanchronicle.com, dtnext.in), rediff.com (neutral report)
This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.