
Activist Snehamayi Krishna told the Karnataka High Court on Friday that the Lokayukta police's closure report in the MUDA land scam case against former chief minister Siddaramaiah and others is 'inconclusive' and…
Activist Snehamayi Krishna told the Karnataka High Court on Friday that the Lokayukta police's closure report in the MUDA land scam case against former chief minister Siddaramaiah and others is 'inconclusive' and amounts to a mini-trial. Senior advocate Lakshmi Iyengar argued the report runs to nearly 10,000 pages, but the trial court accepted it without reasoned findings. The court allowed the petitioner to file the records electronically and directed the registry to secure the trial court records. It listed the matter for further hearing on August 24 and asked respondents to file objections.

The activist has also sought a fresh investigation by an independent agency monitored by a retired High Court judge. The plea notes that the trial court accepted the B report for Mr Siddaramaiah and his family while ordering further investigation against MUDA officials, allegedly from the same transaction. The court had earlier upheld the Governor's sanction to prosecute the former CM in the case.
Two narratives are being stretched: that the closure report fully exonerates Mr Siddaramaiah, and that the case is a pure political vendetta. The truth is the Lokayukta's 10,000-page report was accepted by a trial court, but an activist has now persuaded the High Court to examine its reasoning. A mini-trial at the closure stage is procedurally questionable. The real test comes on August 24 when the court hears objections. Will it order a fresh investigation, or find the report adequate? That will separate due process from propaganda.
Source: livelaw.in
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.