
Akanksha Chamola faced online backlash after defending her description of sexuality as a phase following her elimination from Lock Upp: Sach Ya Sazaa. In a conversation with Tejasswi Prakash, Chamola said emotional,…
Akanksha Chamola faced online backlash after defending her description of sexuality as a phase following her elimination from Lock Upp: Sach Ya Sazaa. In a conversation with Tejasswi Prakash, Chamola said emotional, physical and mental changes had led her to reject sexual relationships while still seeking emotional connection. She also said she was physically incapable of such a relationship.

Chamola had disclosed on the Netflix reality show that she was separating from Gaurav Khanna. She said she had been bisexual before marriage and later described herself as asexual. Clips of her comments drew criticism on X, where users accused her of confusing personal experience with the broader understanding of sexual orientation. Others said sexuality can be fluid and that she needed to express herself more clearly.
The lazy narrative that one television remark can speak for an entire LGBTQ+ community is unfair. So is dismissing Chamola’s personal account without separating bisexuality, asexuality and changing feelings. Her wording was clumsy, especially on a national platform, but online abuse adds little. The useful test is whether future discussions distinguish identity from temporary attraction, and whether viewers judge the claim rather than the person.
Source: hindustantimes.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.