
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation to reconsider retirees’ claims for higher pension, saying employees cannot be penalised for missing employer records. Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda held…
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation to reconsider retirees’ claims for higher pension, saying employees cannot be penalised for missing employer records. Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda held that the EPFO must examine electronic and physical records instead of rejecting claims solely because Forms 6A, challans or similar documents were unavailable, especially for periods before 2010.

The case involved retired Sangam Dairy employees who sought benefits under the Employees’ Pension Scheme after the 2014 amendment allowed eligible employees and employers to contribute on salaries above the Rs 15,000 monthly ceiling. The Court said Form 3A, EPF statements, contribution records and Joint Option forms could help establish eligibility. It ordered fresh consideration and payment of consequential pension benefits if the claims are verified.
The easy narrative that every rejected pension claim reflects EPFO wrongdoing is too broad. The scheme still requires proof of a valid Joint Option and higher-wage contributions. But the opposite claim, that retirees must somehow produce records held by employers or the EPFO, is equally unfair. The practical test is whether the agency conducts a record-based review and publishes clear reasons for each decision, rather than relying on one missing form.
Source: livelaw.in
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.