SC tells Centre to prevent misuse of PAN, EPFO data by private firms

The Supreme Court has directed the Union government to consider a representation alleging that private verification entities are misusing sensitive statutory data, including EPFO/UAN records and PAN-linked information. A bench of CJI…

The Supreme Court has directed the Union government to consider a representation alleging that private verification entities are misusing sensitive statutory data, including EPFO/UAN records and PAN-linked information. A bench of CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana disposed of the PIL, asking the government to take necessary action within four months. The Court termed private access to sovereign data, given to the government under legislative mandate, and its commercial exploitation as worrisome.

Supreme Court orders govt to act on EPFO-PAN data breach plea

Petitioner Piyush Sharma told the Court that in a test, merely furnishing PAN and UAN to a private verification system returned his complete employment history without any OTP or consent. The petition flagged services like 'EPFO Passbook API' and 'Income Tax Return API', suggesting an unregulated ecosystem enabling commercial verification, moonlighting detection, and labour profiling. The Court said the matter fell within policy domain but required an antidote with expert assistance.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Both LivLaw and Times of India report the same Supreme Court order, but the framing differs subtly. LivLaw foregrounds the procedural outcome, the Court directing the government to consider the representation within four months, and names the petitioner and his counsel. Times of India leads with the Court's expressed concern about private access to 'sovereign data' and includes more detail of the petitioner's personal test, where no OTP was generated. The neutral reading: the Court treated the matter as a policy issue needing executive action, not immediate adjudication. The four-month deadline for a comprehensive decision is the concrete next step to watch.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): livelaw.in (neutral report), timesofindia.indiatimes.com (neutral report)

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.