Now Reading: Bhagwat and Modi differ sharply on the legitimacy of protests
-
01
Bhagwat and Modi differ sharply on the legitimacy of protests
The Federal reports a contrast between RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s description of protest as a legitimate form of democratic dialogue and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2021 use of “andolanjeevi” to attack supporters…
The Story in Brief
The Federal reports a contrast between RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s description of protest as a legitimate form of democratic dialogue and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2021 use of “andolanjeevi” to attack supporters of the farmers’ agitation. The divergence became visible again during recent student and youth protests, which were widely seen as centred on a serious issue, the report says.
The article argues that the RSS fears blanket support for government action could alienate its social base, while Modi’s political approach has often treated mass mobilisation as a threat to his image of firmness. Bhagwat’s remarks may mark an effort to distinguish the RSS from the BJP leadership, though the report says the organisation remains closely tied to the government’s broader ideological and institutional agenda.
The Indian Opinion
Claims that Bhagwat’s remarks prove an imminent RSS-Modi break look exaggerated. The Federal describes a real difference in language and political instinct, but also records the RSS’s continued gains under Modi’s government and its support for key Hindutva objectives. Equally, reducing every protest to an anti-government conspiracy ignores the democratic role of dissent. The practical test is whether future protests receive dialogue before coercion, and whether governments respond to demands before electoral damage forces them to act.
Source: thefederal.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.
