
The Bombay High Court on Thursday overturned a trial court's acquittal of former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal, convicting him of rape and sexual assault of a woman journalist in a hotel elevator…
The Bombay High Court on Thursday overturned a trial court's acquittal of former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal, convicting him of rape and sexual assault of a woman journalist in a hotel elevator in Goa in 2013. The High Court bench of Justices Neela Gokhale and Amit Jamsandekar termed the earlier judgment 'perverse' and a 'textbook case of how not to write a rape judgement.' The trial had taken six years to begin, and the survivor waited 13 years for this verdict. Tejpal has said he will appeal the conviction and his 10-year jail term.

The High Court sharply criticized the trial court for resorting to stereotypes about how a rape survivor should behave, noting that 'expecting a survivor to be constantly miserable, meek or visibly broken' is wrong. The judgment emphatically rejects the 'perfect victim' myth, stating that credibility must be evaluated on facts, not on whether a survivor fits a narrow cultural mould. The case is one of the first high-profile trials after amendments to criminal law following the 2012 Delhi gang-rape.

The easily repeated narrative that justice is always delayed or denied for powerful men conveniently ignores the specific judicial reasoning here. The Bombay High Court didn't just reverse an acquittal; it dismantled an entire framework of victim-blaming embedded in the trial court's 527-page judgment. The real shock is not that Tarun Tejpal was finally convicted, it is that the earlier judge produced what the HC called a 'textbook case of how not to write a rape judgement.' The test now is whether the muscle of money and connections can still intimidate the survivor into silence during the appeal, or whether this verdict stands.
Source: hindustantimes.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.